In or Out Corporate Innovation


Corporate Innovation on life-support. What’s an Innovator to do?

It’s no secret, that in today’s internet-speed environment, “innovate or be amazon-ed” is the new mantra. But, according to a PwC report, nearly three-quarters of businesses admit that they are not out-innovating their competitors.

Much of Internal Corporate Innovation continues to look more like ‘Theatre Innovation’ than the real deal. The flaws: too siloed, too insular, too slow to adapt, too many sign-offs, too many hurdles; the internal constraints go on and on.

When Scott Emmons, Neiman Marcus’ head of innovation left the company (in early 2019), he wrote an op-ed on his departure: “Processes are broken, execution is too slow, politics stalls decision-making and resources are too scarce.”

We, at The Innovation Scout, have been on all sides of this equation – Corporate Strategy & Ops, Innovation Consultants, Serial Entrepreneurs for Start-ups, Emerging Tech SMEs, etc.; so, for us; the picture is pretty clear. Corporations were created to be ‘faster, better, cheaper’ around core products and processes, not to come up with disruptive ideas that derail and cannibalize. The Business Units of these corporations have a vested interest in status quo. The execs who lead the BUs are climbing the corp ladder, guided and incentivized by success of their offerings. Add to that, they are generally well represented in innovation governance and they control most of the discretionary budget. It all adds up to the perfect environment for stasis.

To be fair, there are exceptions. Procter & Gamble’s Connect + Develop program is a notable example. In a rare move, P&G built a program around open innovation that actually highlighted the company’s pain points and untapped opportunities. Using these highlights, P&G leveraged outside talent and emerging technologies to solve for gaps and solutions. Rather than exhausting internal resources on R&D, the Connect + Develop program allows P&G to put out an open call for new ideas from innovators and patent-holders that already have a notable level of expertise in that particular space. This allowed P&G to create a platform that could identify and engage with innovative resources outside the companies own competencies.

Herein is the corporations answer to the innovation dilemma: Start thinking, engaging and creating outside the company. In our opinion, corporations should stop trying to make innovation happen solely from within, where it is clearly not working. Instead, they should partner with an external innovation resource that can provide a shorter, more efficient route to innovation success.

External resources have the benefit of sitting outside the challenge. They benefit from a perspective, not tethered to internal opinions, architecture, and legacy – in short, a more holistic view. Approaching innovation from “the outside in” will open a new vantage; providing a number of new tools and benefits that corporations can incorporate into their strategy. Here are some things to consider:

1. Added resources for speed and agility  

It’s much easier for external partners to navigate the corporate ecosystem while keeping an agile and nimble mindset. If a new concept is not performing well, outside innovators can quickly move on to the next idea without being constrained by internal bureaucracy.

2. New Processes

Outside resources can bring agile processes into an organization. Take Proof-of-Concept (POC) for example. Forget slow, plodding pilots. With today’s POC expertise, a company can create a Minimal Viable Product (MVP) within 100 days of ideation. Designing, Developing and Testing with internal and customer input along the way.

3. Subject Matter Expertise (SME)

An innovation partner has the ability to form a deeper talent pool that is laser-focused on what’s needed for the brand to get to the next level. Instead of recycling ideas internally, a dedicated team can offer fresh perspectives and cater to creativity.

While the team may vary from industry veterans and strategists to developers and creatives, a standalone innovation environment empowers a core group of people who are consistently working collaboratively to yield the highest performing, next-generation innovations.

Thinking about innovation from the outside-in may be just what the legacy corp innovation group needs to stay relevant in today’s fast-paced, “innovate or be disrupted” environment.








167 thoughts on “In or Out Corporate Innovation

  1. Pingback: ic stromectol 6
  2. Pingback: cialis tab 10mg
  3. Pingback: deltasone 20mg a45
  4. Pingback: ivermectin 5 mg
  5. Pingback: ivermect 6mg
  6. Pingback: ivermectay 6 mg
  7. Pingback: generic cialis
  8. Pingback: generic viagra
  9. Pingback: generic ivermectin
  10. Pingback: cheap viagra no rx
  11. Pingback: praziquantel price
  12. Pingback: viagra buy china
  13. Pingback: pfizer viagra
  14. Pingback: 360 viagra
  15. Pingback: viagra generic otc
  16. Pingback: cialis liquid
  17. Pingback: 25 mg of viagra
  18. Pingback: best viagra pills
  19. Pingback: yazoo lawn mower
  20. Pingback: online pharmacy ro
  21. Pingback: sildenafil mexico
  22. Pingback: buy ivermectin uk
  23. Pingback: flccc ivermectin
  24. Pingback:
  25. Pingback: Anonymous
  26. Pingback: flcc email
  27. Pingback: ivermectin 0.08
  28. Pingback: ivermectin 1%
  29. Pingback: Anonymous
  30. Pingback: ivermectin 2ml
  31. Pingback: ivermectin 50ml
  32. Pingback: ivermectin 3 mg
  33. Pingback: ivermectin canada
  34. Pingback: Anonymous
  35. Pingback: ivermectin cost
  36. Pingback: cost of ivermectin
  37. Pingback: kamagra vs cialis
  38. Pingback: provigil cialis
  39. Pingback: cialis daily
  40. Pingback: tadalafil mylan
  41. Pingback: kamagra 100mg
  42. Pingback: stromectol preis
  43. Pingback: generic cialis
  44. Pingback: cialis kopen
  45. Pingback: 3preston
  46. Pingback: flüssig viagra
  47. Pingback: tadalafil liquid
  48. Pingback: casinos online usa
  49. Pingback: cheap cialis india
  50. Pingback: ivermectin 8 mg
  51. Pingback: real casino slots
  52. Pingback: cialis tablets
  53. Pingback: viagra
  54. Pingback: lasix 500 mg tab
  55. Pingback: stromectol tab 3mg
  56. Pingback: ivermectin 5
  57. Pingback: stromectol at
  58. Pingback: lucky slots
  59. Pingback: stromectol generic
  60. Pingback: ivermectin trials
  61. Pingback: stromectol usa
  62. Pingback: ivermectina
  63. Pingback: stromectol at
  64. Pingback: ivermectina
  65. Pingback: ivermectin canada

Leave a Reply